您的当前位置:首页An interpretative model of foreign direct investment in China An economic policy approach

An interpretative model of foreign direct investment in China An economic policy approach

2023-06-25 来源:乌哈旅游
ChinaEconomicReview15(2004)268–280

Aninterpretativemodelofforeigndirectinvestment

inChina:Aneconomicpolicyapproach

´MiguelGINER*,GracielaGINER1Jose

DepartmentofAppliedEconomicsandEconomicPolicy,UniversityofAlicante,

P.O.Box99,E-03080Alicante,Spain

Accepted16July2003

Abstract

Theobjectiveofthispaperistoelaborateaninterpretativemodelofforeigndirectinvestment(FDI)inChinabasedonanintegratedviewofeconomicpolicy.Alongwiththeanalysisofpurelyeconomicfactors,othervariableswillbeincorporatedsuchasthoserelatingtosociopoliticalinstability,thebusinessoperatingcontext,andtheexistenceofanexport-orientedpolicy.Themethodologythatwehavechosenrecognisestheimportanceofeconomicelementsaswellasthatofsociopoliticalelements,especiallywithregardtocountriesintheprocessofdevelopment,transition,andreform,suchasChina.

D2003ElsevierInc.Allrightsreserved.

JELclassification:C5;F2;P2

Keywords:Foreigndirectinvestment;Model;Macroeconomicfactors;Sociopoliticalfactors;China

1.Introduction

Thereexistsabroadconsensusthatforeigndirectinvestment(FDI)occurswhenthreedeterminingfactorsexist:thepresenceofspecificcompetitiveadvantages,whicharethepropertyofamultinationalcompany;theexistenceofspecificadvantagesoflocatinginthecountryreceivingtheinvestment;andthepresenceofgreatercommercialadvantagesattheintracompanylevel.

WhilethefirstandthirdconditionsarespecificbusinessfactorsaffectingFDI,thesecondisspecifictolocationandexertsacrucialinfluenceontheflowofdirect

*Correspondingauthor.Tel.:+34-965903958;fax:+34-965903603.

E-mailaddresses:giner@ua.es(J.M.Giner),graciela.giner@ua.es(G.Giner).1Tel.:+34-965903400x3171;fax:+34-965903603.

1043-951X/$-seefrontmatterD2003ElsevierInc.Allrightsreserved.doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2003.07.002

J.M.Giner,G.Giner/ChinaEconomicReview15(2004)268–280269

investmenttowardsthereceivingcountry.Ifonlythefirstconditionexists,companiestendtofocusonexportation,licensing,orthesaleofpatentstoattendtotheforeignmarket.Ifthethirdconditionalsoexists,FDIbeginstobethepreferredmodel,butonlywhenspecificadvantagesoflocationarealsopresent.Whenallthreeconditionsexist,thefactorsoflocationaretheonlyonesthatcanbedirectlyinfluencedbygovernmentsofthosecountriesreceivingdirectinvestmentfromabroad.

InordertoexplainthedifferencesintheflowsofinvestmentbetweendifferentcountriesandtoformulatepoliciesdesignedtoattractFDI,wemustnotonlyunderstandhowandwhymultinationalcompanieselectcertaincountriesorzonesforsuchinvestmentbutalsothemannerinwhichthesemultinationalsact.

Theanalyticapproachthatwehavechosentouseinthispaperissimilartothatemployedinmacroeconomicstudies.Althoughmanysuchstudieshavediscoveredtheimportanceofeconomicdeterminants,thereexistsnoconsensusaboutthose.Alongwithpurelyeconomicelements,manyauthors,amongthemSinghandJun(1995),haveemphasisedtheimportanceofpoliticalandinstitutionalquestionsasdeterminingfactorsinFDI.AlthougheachtheoreticalandanalyticalapproachprovidesapartialvisionofthecomplexityoftheflowsofFDI,theredoesnotyetexistanintegratedtheorythatcombinestheseelementsinananalyticalmanner.WehaveattemptedtoovercomethissignificantlimitationbyproposinganintegratedanalyticalapproachthatexplainstheFDIdirectedtowardsChinaandbypointingoutnotonlyeconomicfactorsbutalsotheimportantroleofvariablesassociatedwithpoliticalstabilityandwiththeenvironmentwithinwhichcompaniesmustfunction.Theempiricalresearchthatwehaveutilisediscentred,therefore,onproducingmodelsofmacroeconomicandsociopoliticalfactorsthataffecttheflowofFDItoChina.InSection2,wereviewtherecentliteraturedealingwiththeoreticalandempiricalaspectsofFDI.IntheSection3,weproposeaninterpretativemodelderivedfromanintegratedfocusoneconomicpolicyoftheFDIinChina.Togetherwiththeanalysisofpurelyeconomicfactors,weincorporatevariablesassociatedwithsociopoliticalinstability,withtheconditionsinwhichcompaniesmustdobusinessandwithanexport-orientedstance.Finally,wepresentourconclusions.

2.Theoreticalandempiricalperspectives:areviewofrecentliterature2.1.Empiricalapproaches

TheliteraturedescribingthefactorsthatdeterminetheflowofFDI,usingdifferentandvariedmethodologies,isvoluminousandcontroversial.Empiricalstudiesthatevaluatethesedeterminingfactorsaregenerallybasedononeofthreeapproaches.Thesearemicroeconometricstudies,studiesusingdataanalysis,andaggregateeconometricstudies.2.1.1.Microeconometricstudies

Thesestudieshavebeencarriedoutatthefirmandindustriallevel,particularlyinthoseindustriesconsidered‘‘footloose,’’2suchasthosewefindintheelectronicssector.When

2Industriesthatfacenorestrictionsonwheretheychosetolocate.

270J.M.Giner,G.Giner/ChinaEconomicReview15(2004)268–280

thedecisiontoinvestisacorporatedecision,suchdesegregatedstudiesarevaluablebecausetheycapturethecomplexityofthedeterminingfactorsintheflowofFDIwithinaspecificindustry.However,althoughthemajorityofstudiesuseadependentvariablespecifictothesector(normallytheStandardIndustrialCodeorSIC—anumbercomprisedoftwoorthreedigits),theexplanatoryvariableshavedimensionsthatarespecifictotheareaortothecountry.

Forexample,WoodwardandRolfe(1993)haveanalysedthefactorspertainingtothelocationofFDIorientedtowardsfomentingexportsintheCaribbean.ThedependentvariableusedinthisstudywasderivedfromdataprovidedbytheU.S.DepartmentofCommercewithregardto187instancesofinvestmentinthecreationofnewfactories.Alsousedasexplanatoryvariableswerevariousaggregatevariablesspecifictotheregion,suchaspercapitaGNP,politicalstability,theavailabilityoffree-tradezones,concentra-tionofindustry,andtheavailabilityofland.Asaconsequence,thistypeofstudydoesnothaveatotallymicroorientationandthereforemayfailtoadequatelyexplaininvestmentdecisionsbasedonregionalconsiderations.Studiesdealingwithonespecificcompanyaremoreusefulforincorporatingmicroaspects,buttheyoftenfailtoprovidegeneralisationsthatmaybeappliedtoadevelopingeconomy.

2.1.2.Dataanalysisstudies

Thesestudiesanalysekeyfactorsthatmotivateinvestors;ideally,theyaredesignedtostudythequalitativefactorsthatotherwisemaybedifficulttoincorporateinaneconometricmodel.AgoodexampleofthisapproachisthatofRolfe,Ricks,Pointer,andMcCarthy(1993).

Inthisstudy,aquestionnairewassenttothedirectorsofNorthAmericancompaniesthathadinternationalinvestments.Theywereaskedtoprovidearankedlistof20specificincentivestoinvestment.Theresultsdemonstratedthataveryhighvaluewasplacedonthelackofrestrictionsonpaymentsmadebetweencompaniesandonthepaymentofdividends.Onegeneraldisadvantageassociatedwiththisapproachisthatstudiesbasedonsurveysareinherentlylimited,particularlywithregardtothesensitivityofrepliestothestructureandstyleofsurveyquestions(Wallsten,1980).

2.1.3.Aggregateeconometricstudies

Thatisourempiricalapproachofreferenceinourresearch.Aggregatedstatisticalstudiesattempttoevaluatethespecificdeterminantsexistinginthecountryorregionwithreferencetoglobaltendenciesoftheflowofinvestmentfunds(FDI).Byanalysingdataonamacroeconomiclevel,thesestudiescanprovideavisionofthestructuralcharacteristicsandmacroeconomicpoliciesthatfavourtheflowofFDI.Butbecauseitisdifficulttoincorporatespecificfactorsatthecorporateorindustriallevelinthesemacrostudies,therelativeaggregatevaluesonlycapturegeneralandlong-termtendencies.

WecanfindareviewofFDIdeterminants,usingseveraldifferentmethodologies,inPearce,Islam,andSauvant(1992).

Becauseeachapproachhasitsownadvantagesandlimitations,pluralisminmethod-ologyishighlydesirable.Onewaytoprovethesolidityofourfindingsistofilterthesameproblemthroughdifferentmethodologies.Agarwal(1980),Hein(1992),andSchneider

J.M.Giner,G.Giner/ChinaEconomicReview15(2004)268–280271

andFrey(1985)havecarriedoutsuchanevaluationofempiricalstudiesbasedonanaggregatedeconometricapproach.

2.2.MacroeconomicandsociopoliticaldeterminantsoftheFDI:empiricalbackgroundTheempiricalbackgroundpresentedinthissectioniscentredonthosemacroeconomicandsociopoliticaldeterminantsthatinfluencetheflowofFDItowardsChina.Althoughtherearenosimplemodelsbasedonsolidtheoreticalprinciplesthatmightguidetheempiricalanalysisofthesequestions,wehavebasedourworkontheresultsofpaststudies,principallyonthoseofSinghandJun(1995),whoexaminethedeterminantsofFDIin30developingcountries.Otherrelevantandrecentstudieswithaspecificfocushavebeenexamined(Liu,Wang,&Wei,2001;Song,Liu,&Jiang,2001;Wu,2001;Zhang&Felmingham,2001;Zhao,2001).

Althoughmanyaggregateeconometricstudieshavebeencarriedout,thereisnever-thelessnoconsensusontheprincipaldeterminantsofFDI.ThislackofconsensuscanbeattributedatleastinparttothelackofpreciseandtrustworthydataontheflowofFDIandonitspotentialdeterminingfactors,particularlyatthesectoriallevel,aswellastothefactthatthemajorityofempiricalstudiescarriedouthaveanalysedthedeterminantsofFDIbygroupingtogetheraseriesofcountriesthatmaybestructurallydifferent.

Inouranalysis,besidesthetraditionaleconomicvariablessuchasGDPpercapita,GDPgrowth,andlabourcosts,wewillincludevariablesofasociopoliticalnatureasfactorsthatmayaffecttheflowofFDItoChina.ThisanalysisisintegratedinaresearchlinedevelopedbyauthorsinthefieldoftheChinaeconomyandFDI(Giner,2000;GinerandGiner,1999,2000,2001,2002a,2002b).

2.2.1.Socialandpoliticalinstability

Althoughpoliticalriskmayhaveanimpactonforeigninvestmentdecisions,empiricalresultsshowthatthisisnotalwaysthecase.Aharoni(1966)considersthatapartfromthepotentialofthemarket,politicalinstabilityisthemostsignificantvariable.

Ontheotherhand,BennetandGreen(1972)believethatdirectinvestmentfromtheUnitedStatesisnotaffectedbythepoliticalinstabilitythatmayexistinthosecountriesreceivingtheinvestment.Levis(1979),usingtwoproxyvariablesforpoliticalinstability,obtainedmixedresults.HefoundthatpoliticalinstabilitywasindeedasignificantdeterminantofFDIintoday’sworld,althoughitwasnotinthepast.Anothervariable,thelegitimacyoftheregimeinpower,wasfoundtobesignificantforpastperiodsbutnotfortoday’sinvestmentdecisions.

Analysesof58developingcountries,carriedoutbyRootandAhmed(1979),haveshownthatthenumberofchangesinleadershipofthecountrybetween1956and1967wasasignificantfactor.Nevertheless,otherpoliticalvariablessuchasthenumberofinternalarmedattacks,thedegreeofnationalism,andthecolonialaffiliationofthecountrywerenotsignificant.

SchneiderandFrey(1985)foundanegativerelationshipbetweenFDIandthenumberofpoliticalstrikesandscandalsincountriesreceivinginvestment.Nigh(1985),usingCOBDAB,adatabasethatprovidesanaggregatemeasureofconflictsandcooperationwithinagivencountryaswellasbetweencountries,hasdemonstratedthatfordeveloped

272J.M.Giner,G.Giner/ChinaEconomicReview15(2004)268–280

countries,itisthepoliticaleventsthatoccurbetweencountriesthatdetermineFDIandnottheeventsthatoccurwithinagivencountry.Ontheotherhand,fordevelopingcountries,internalpoliticaleventshaveastronginfluenceonFDI.

Morerecently,WheelerandMody(1992)havefoundthatthecomponentmeasuringadministrativeefficiencyandpoliticalriskcouldbestatisticallyinsignificant.Lucas(1993)doesnotdirectlyincorporateproxyvariablesforsociopoliticalrisk.Hedoes,however,discoverthat‘‘goodevents’’suchastheAsiaticandOlympicgamesinKorea,theascensiontopowerofAquinointhePhilippines,etc.,areindeedrelatedinapositivemannertoFDI.Ontheotherhand,‘‘badevents’’suchastheregimeofSuhartoinIndonesia,theassassinationofParkinKorea,andtheimpositionofmartiallawbyMarcosinthePhilippinesallhavenegativeeffectsonFDI.

Empiricalevidenceontheimpactofpoliticalriskisnotunequivocalsinceitisdifficulttoobtainreliablequantitativeestimatesofthisqualitativephenomenonoveralongperiodoftime.Thisisparticularlytruewithregardtosomeaspectsofpoliticalriskthatmaybeseenbyforeigninvestorsasimposingdirectrestrictionsininvestment.Politicalinstabilityisaverycomplexphenomenon.Themajorityofproxyvariablesavailablecanonlycapturecertainaspectsofthisdeterminingfactor.

2.2.2.Businessoperatingcontext

AsHelleiner(1989)haspointedout,government-createdincentivesforinvestment,suchastaxholidays,appeartoplayalimitedroleininvestmentdecisionsbetweencountries.ThemajorityofempiricalliteraturesupportsthenotionthatspecificincentivesdonothaveamajorimpactonFDI,particularlywhentheseincentivesaredesignedtocompensateforothercomparativedisadvantages.Ontheotherhand,itisgenerallybelievedthatbyeliminatingrestrictionsandprovidingabetterenvironmentforcompanies,theflowofFDIwillbepositivelyaffected.

Inthiscontext,thereexistsawidegamutofgovernmentalpoliciesthatcanincreaseorreduceFDIflows.Itisdifficulttoquantifythesepoliciesasexplanatoryvariables;analternativemethodistouseaqualitativeindexrepresentingthejudgementofexpertsinthefield.

Oneveryrelevantpointinthiscontextistheroleplayedbytariffbarriers.ExaminationofthehypothesisassociatedwiththeideathatprotectionisttariffbarriersthatmaystimulateFDIsubstitutesforimportationhasshowninconclusiveresults.Nevertheless,themajorityofavailableempiricalevidencesupportsthishypothesis,particularlytheanalysisofU.S.FDIintheEuropeanUnion.

2.2.3.Orientationtoexport

Alongwiththesizeofthedomesticmarketinthecountryreceivingforeigninvestment,aproclivitytoexportisanotherimportantfactorinfavouringandsuccessfullyattractinginvestment.Recently,Dollar(1992)andHein(1992)havediscoveredthatdevelopingeconomiesthatareorientedtowardsexteriormarkets(thatexpecttofindnewexportmarkets)havebeenrelativelyprosperous.Lucas’(1993)investigationofthecountriesofSoutheastAsiagivessomeevidenceoftherelativeimportanceofpoliciesorientedtowardstheexterior.Specifically,FDIisrelativelymoreelasticwithrespecttoexportdemandthanwithrespecttoaggregatedomesticdemand.Furthermore,ifthoseeconomiesthatare

J.M.Giner,G.Giner/ChinaEconomicReview15(2004)268–280273

orientedtowardstheexteriorareindeedmoresuccessfulinattractinggreaterquantitiesofFDI,thesizeofthedomesticmarketceasestobeanimpediment.Evensmallcountriesreceivinginvestmentcaninfluencethedecisionsofforeigncompaniesbyfomentingpoliciesorientedtowardsexports.

However,theexistingempiricalliteraturedoesnotestablishwhethertheflowsofFDIareattractedbyeconomiesthatarealreadyorientedtowardsexportation(exportsprecedetheflowsofFDI)orwhethermultinationalinvestmentincreasesexports(FDIprecedesexports).Obviously,fromapoliticalpointofview,itisimportanttoknowwhicheventcausestheother.

3.AninterpretativemodelofFDIinChina3.1.Hypothesis,data,andmodelspecifications

WehaveconstructedamodelbasedpartiallyontheanalysiscarriedoutbySinghandJun(1995).Whiletheirstudyisbasedonamodelthatincorporatesacrosssectionofdevelopingcountries,ouranalysiswasconductedfortheperiod1980–1997(18observations)andforonecountry:thePeople’sRepublicofChina.Thedataperiodisannualandthedataarepresentedasapuretimeseries.Thesourcesofdataareasfollows:-ChinaStatisticalYearbook,StateStatisticalBureau(1996,1997,1998).-InternationalFinancialStatistics,InternationalMonetaryFund.-BusinessEnvironmentRiskIntelligence(BERI).

ThedependentvariableisFDIcalculatedinlocalcurrency(Reminbi)atconstantprices.FDIreferstonetinvestmentmadebyforeigncompanies,excludingrepatriatedprofits.UsingLeamer’s(1985)approach,arangeofspecificationsisestimatedtoassessthesensitivityofthecoefficientsofthehypothesisedvariables.Thehypothesestestingcanberepresentedbyasimpleequation:

FDI¼FðHV;CVÞ

Basedonthediscussionofthelastsectionandonthecontextofourmodel,wetestthefollowingempiricalhypothesisandnoteourresultsinSection3.2:Hypothesis1.PoliticalinstabilitynegativelyaffectstheflowofFDI.

Hypothesis2.ThegeneralperceptionthatafavourablebusinessenvironmentexistsinthecountryreceivingtheinvestmentpositivelyaffectstheflowofFDI.Hypothesis3.TheexportsarerelatedtotheflowofFDI.

Besidesspecifyingtheproxyvariableassociatedwiththehypothesis(HV)—seethenextsections—itisimportanttospecifythevectorofcontrolvariables(CV)inordertocorrectlystatetheequation.Thecontrolvariablesareprogressivelyintroducedintothe

274J.M.Giner,G.Giner/ChinaEconomicReview15(2004)268–280

modelinordertodeterminetherobustnessofourresultsvis-a-visalternativespecifica-tions.Thestabilityofthecoefficientsofthehypothesisedvariablecanbeassessedasthecontrolvariables.Notethattheprimaryfocusisonthecoefficientsofthehypothesisedvariable,thatis,toobservewhetherthatarerobustasdifferentcontrolsareimplemented.Thecoefficientsofthecontrolvariablesarenotsubjectedtoanysystematicanalysisandthusshouldbeinterpretedwithcaution.

Thecontrolvariablesofouranalysisareasfollows:Sizeofthemarket:GDPpercapita(GDPPC)andtherateofgrowthoftheGDP(RGGDP).

Labourcosts:anindexofrealgainsasacontrolvariableforrealwages(EARN).Exchangerate:therealexchangerateasacontrolvariable(XRATE).

Factorsinthecountryoforigin:theindexofaverageindustrialproductionofthecountriesthatcomposetheG-7(Canada,Japan,UK,Italy,France,theUnitedStates,andGermany)(IPG7),calculatedwithdataprovidedbytheIMF’sInternationalFinancialStatisticsdepartment.

Theimportanceofexports:exportsrelatedtoGDPareincludedasacontrolvariable(EXPTPTR).

Laggeddependentvariable:theregressiveindependentvariableisusedasacontrolvariable(FDI1).

Timeeffect:adummyvariablethatcapturestheeffectsrelatedwithtime(DTIME).Theinclusionofadditionalvariablescanalsodemonstratetheextentofmulticollinearityintheestimatedequation.

Anotherissuethatshouldbeaddressedistheproblemofautocorrelation.Theinclusionofthelaggeddependentvariablereducesautocorrelationconsiderably.Becausewehavealaggeddependentvariableontherighthandside,theDurbin–Watsonstatisticisnotstrictlyapplicable,althoughitdoesgivesomeindicationoftheextentofautocorrelation.Foreachhypothesis,thealternativeDurbinstatisticiscalculated.TheDurbinalternativetestinvolvesregressingtheerrortermoftheprimaryequationwithalltheexplanatoryvariablesandthelaggederrorterm.Asignificanttvalueforthelaggederrortermindicatesthepresenceofautocorrelation.AftercalculatingDurbinalternativetest,theresultsshowusthattheautocorrelationisnotsignificant.

Inthefirststageoftheresearch,allmodelsareestimatedusingordinaryleastsquares(OLS).Thereisapotentialsimultaneityamongtheexplanatorsthatmayrequireaninstrumentalvariables(IV)ortwo-stageleastsquares(TSLS)estimation.IVorTSLSarepreferredtoOLSinthepresenceofsimultaneity.

Afundamentalassumptionofregressionanalysisisthattheright-handsidevariablesareuncorrelatedwiththedisturbanceterm.Ifthisassumptionisviolated,bothOLSandweightedLSarebiasedandinconsistent.Thereareanumberofsituationswheresomeoftheright-handsidevariablesarecorrelatedwithdisturbances.Someclassicexamplesoccurwhen:

-Thereareendogenouslydeterminedvariablesontheright-handsideoftheequation.-Right-handsidevariablesaremeasuredwitherror.

J.M.Giner,G.Giner/ChinaEconomicReview15(2004)268–280275

Thestandardapproachincaseswheretheright-handsidevariablesarecorrelatedwiththeresidualsistoestimatetheequationusingtheIVregression.TheideabehindIVistofindasetofvariables(termedinstruments)thatareboth(1)correlatedwiththeexplanatoryvariablesintheequationand(2)uncorrelatedwiththedisturbances.Theseinstrumentsareusedtoeliminatethecorrelationbetweenright-handsidevariablesandthedisturbances.TSLSisaspecialcaseofIVregression.Asthenamesuggests,therearetwodistinctstagesinTSLS.Inthefirststage,TSLSfindstheportionsoftheendogenousandexogenousvariablesthatcanbeattributedtotheinstruments.ThisstageinvolvesestimatinganOLSregressionofeachvariableinthemodelonthesetofinstruments.Thesecondstageisaregressionoftheoriginalequation,withallofthevariablesreplacedbythefittedvaluesfromthefirst-stageregressions.ThecoefficientsofthisregressionaretheTSLSestimates.ForadiscussionofthefinitesamplepropertiesofTSLS,seeDavidsonandMacKinnon(1993,pp.221–224)orJohnstonandDiNardo(1997,pp.355–358).TheIVofouranalysesthatarebothcorrelatedwiththeexplanatoryvariables(HV)intheequationanduncorrelatedwiththedisturbancesareDTIME,FDI1,RGGDP,EARN,IPG7,XRATE,andEXPTPTR.

3.1.1.Sociopoliticalinstability

Wetestedthefirsthypothesisusingaproxyvariablethatincorporatesthevariousaspectsofpoliticalinstability.Thisvariableisthepoliticalriskindex(PRI)developedbyBERIinwhichapproximately60specialistsinpoliticsandpoliticalsciencefromallovertheworldevaluateeachcountrywithrespecttointernalcausesofpoliticalriskandthesymptomsofsuchrisk(demonstrations,strikes,streetviolence,etc.).Anaverageofthevaluesdeterminedbythesespecialistsforeachcountryiscalculatedonanannualbasis.Thisindexrangesfrom0(prohibitiverisk)to100(completestability).ThemodelspecificationofHypothesis1is:

FDI¼b0þb1PRIþ

nXi¼2

biCVi

whereb0istheconstantparameter;b1isthehypothesisvariableparameter;biisthecon-trolvariablesparameters;PRIisthehypothesisvariable;andCViisthecontrolvariables.3.1.2.Businessoperatingcontext

EventhoughHelleiner(1989)hasindicatedthatthespecificincentivesestablishedbygovernmentsseemtoplayalimitedroleintheinvestmentdecisionsbetweencountries,thereexistsageneralbeliefthattheconditionsinwhichforeigncompaniesmustoperatearedeterminingfactorsinattractingFDI.Inordertoevaluatethisargument(Hypothesis2),weanalyseoperationriskindex(ORI)asaproxyvariabletothebusinessenvironment.ThemodelspecificationofHypothesis2is:

FDI¼b0þb1ORIþ

nXi¼2

biCVi

whereb0istheconstantparameter;b1isthehypothesisvariableparameter;biisthecontrol

variablesparameters;ORIisthehypothesisvariable;andCViisthecontrolvariables.

276J.M.Giner,G.Giner/ChinaEconomicReview15(2004)268–280

TheORI,conceivedbyBERI,measuresthedegreetowhichthecomplexconditionsofoperatinginaforeigncountryaffectproductionandprofitsobtainedbytheinvestingcompany.

Thisindexisdesignedtomeasuretheclimateofcommercialoperations.Itiscalculatedusingtwovariablesforeachcountry,positedbyapanelof105expertsfromallovertheworld:

-Thedegreeinwhichapreferentialtreatmentisgiventonationals.

-Thegeneralbusinessclimate,includingpoliticalandadministrativecontinuity.Thisindexwillhavevaluesthatrangefrom0(unacceptablebusinessconditions)to100(unimprovableconditions).

3.1.3.OrientationtoexportandFDI

Inthissection,welookatthelinkbetweenexportsandFDI(Hypothesis3).Lookingatthecorrelationcoefficients,wemustpointouttheimportantcorrelationthatexistsbetweenFDIandtotalexportsinrelationtoGDP(EXPTOTR),whichhasavalueof.95.Thiscorrelationisevengreaterinthecaseofmanufacturedexports(EXPMFR)withavalueof.96thaninthecaseofexportsofprimaryproducts(EXPPPR),whichhaveavalueof.85.TheChineseeconomyclearlydemonstratesatendencytobecomeprogressivelymoreopen,withtherelativeimportanceofexportswithrespecttoGDPshowingatendencytogrow.ThemodelspecificationofHypothesis3is:

FDI¼b0þb1EXPTOTRþ

nXi¼2

biCVi

whereb0istheconstantparameter;b1isthehypothesisvariableparameter;biisthe

controlvariablesparameters;EXPTOTRisthehypothesisvariable;andCViisthecontrolvariables.

3.2.Resultsandinterpretationofthemodel

3.2.1.Sociopoliticalinstability

Table1showsasynthesisoftheresultsobtainedforthedifferentspecificationsofthemodelwithalternativehypothesisvariablesandcontrolvariables.Ascanbeobserved,thevariablehypothesis(PRI)issignificantinthevariousspecificationsofthemodel,itscoefficienttakingapositiveandrelativelystablevalue.

Initially,inModel1,theregressionofFDIwithPRI,adummyvariablethatcapturestheeffectsrelatedwithtime(DTIME)andtheregressiveindependentvariable(FDI1)wascarriedout.PRIcoefficientissignificant.ThevariablesDTIMEandFDI1arealsosignificant.

InModel2,togetherwiththevariablesofModel1,weintroduceacontrolvariable,theexchangerate(XRATE).Ascanbeobserved,thesignremainsthesameandthecoefficientofthevariablehypothesisissignificance.Theestimatedcoefficientassociatedwiththecontrolvariable(XRATE)isstatisticallysignificantandhasapositivevalue.

J.M.Giner,G.Giner/ChinaEconomicReview15(2004)268–280Table1

Regressionresults(TSLS)ModelCHVDTIMEFDI1IPG7

EXPTPTRXRATEAdjustedR2FstatisticHypothesisvariable(HV)

1

À587,791.10**10,201.26**11,627.78***0.64***

2

3

4

À853,331.00***15,171.19***16,096.60***0.58***

5

6

7

8

9

À504,407.70**8080.69**6286.21***755.2619,421.34***0.57**0.70***

À4744.04***25,792.37*0.97103.22PRI

À788,514.50***13,999.95***6962.48***6504.6221,693.54***0.38***0.71***

À5182.13***

5175.52**0.97112.38ORI

0.97132.49ORI

À31,909.91389,442.707603.00*14,812.76***12,685.25**À5460.91À2040.32À6505.37*0.55***0.45*

À5625.67**

À21,236.68*0.9471.04

EXPTOTR

0.96106.16PRI0.97134.85PRI0.96117.13ORI0.9585.89

EXPTOTR0.9149.38

EXPTOTR

*Significantat10%level.**Significantat5%level.***Significantat1%level.

277278J.M.Giner,G.Giner/ChinaEconomicReview15(2004)268–280

ThesameoccursinModel3whenweintroduceIPG7asacontrolvariable.Inthiscase,thevalueofthecoefficientissignificantandtakesanegativesign.Accordingtotheexistingliterature,theexpectedsignofthecoefficientoftheIPG7variablecanbeinterpretedinvariousmanners.Thenegativesignobtainedmaydemonstratetoushowahigherlevelofeconomicactivityinthemostdevelopedcountriesimpliesalesserflowofinvestmenttowardsdevelopingcountries(China,forexample)duetogreatervolumesofinvestmentrequiredbytheeconomiesofdevelopedcountriesinexpansion.

3.2.2.Businessoperatingcontext

TheempiricalresultsassociatedwiththevariablehypothesisORI(Models4,5,and6)indicatethatitisstatisticallysignificantinthedifferentspecificationsassociatedwiththemodel(seeTable1).Itisimportanttonotethatthecoefficientofthevariablehypothesisremainsrelativelystableandwithapositivevaluewhendifferentcontrolvariablesareintroduced.ThesignificantcontrolvariablesinthevariousspecificationsforthemodelsareIPG7andEXPTOTR.

3.2.3.OrientationtoexportandFDI

Aswecanseeintheprecedinganalysisofourhypotheses,totalexportsappearasasignificantcontrolvariable.Uponconsideringtotalexports(EXPTOTR)asavariableofthehypothesis,weseethattherelationshipofthatvariabletotheflowsofinvestment(FDI)ispositiveandsignificant,independentlyofthecontrolvariablesintroducedinthedifferentspecifications(Models7,8,and9)ofthemodel(Table1).Theresultssupportthegeneralnotionthatexportsinduceinvestment.

TheseresultswillbeanalysedinthedebateaboutcomplementarilyorsubstitutabilityofinwardFDIandexportsfromhometothehostcountry.SomebidirectionalcausalitymayexistbetweenFDIandexports.Butthequestionremainsastowhetherexport-orientedeconomiesattractedFDI(exportsprecededFDI)orforeigninvestmentencouragedhigherexports(FDIprecededexports).Toanswerthisquestion,weperformtheGrangercausalitytest.AsLeamer(1985)pointsout,Grangercausalitydoesnotimply‘‘causality’’asdefinedinaLayman’stermsbutrather‘‘precedence’’inalead–lagrelationship.Thereisnoevidenceaboutcausalityinthismodel.

4.Conclusions

Theprincipalconclusionsoftheempiricalinvestigationincludedinourstudystemfromamethodologicalfocusinwhichbothmacroeconomicdeterminantsandsociopolit-icalfactorsthatbearupontheflowofdirectforeigninvestmenttowardsChinaaretakenintoaccount.Andalthoughtherearenosimplemodelsorsolidtheoreticalfundamentsthatguidetheempiricalanalysisofthesequestions,wehavebasedourstudyatleastinpartontheresultsofpaststudies,principallyonthestudyofSinghandJun(1995).

Inthisanalysis,besidesthetraditionaleconomicvariables,weincludeothervariablesofasociopoliticalnatureasfactorsthatcanaffecttheflowsofFDIthataredirectedtowardsChina.Amongthese,wecanpointoutsociopoliticalinstability,thebusinessoperatingcontext,andthedegreetowhichtheeconomyisgearedtowardsexportmarkets.

J.M.Giner,G.Giner/ChinaEconomicReview15(2004)268–280279

Wealsoincludeothervariablesascontrolsinordertoverifyourhypotheses.Theseincludethesizeofthemarket,labourcosts,exchangerates,thecharacteristicsoftheinvestor’scountryoforigin,therelativeimportanceoftheexportssectorinthecountryreceivinginvestment,andtheamountofFDIduringprecedingperiod.

Themethodologythatweelectedrecognisestheimportanceofboththeseeconomicfactorsandthesociopoliticalelementsmentioned,especiallyinacountrythatisgoingthroughaprocessofdevelopment,transition,andreform,asisChina.Fromthepreviousevidence,andaccordingtoourempiricalevidence,wecanpointoutthepoliticalimplicationsthatcanbeextractedfromtheanalysescarriedout,inourcase,forChina.Thefollowingarepoliciesthatmayencouragepotentialinvestors:

-Onaninternallevel:Increasepoliticalstabilityandimprovetheconditionsinwhichcompaniesmustoperate,withoutignoringtheprogramofimprovementofthebasiceconomiccharacteristicssuchastheGDP,theGDPpercapita,thegrowthofGDP,especiallysincethesearethefactorsthatwillcontributetoconsolidatingFDI.

-Onanexternallevel:Intensifyallpoliciespromotingeconomicopenness,fromcommercialpoliciestothoseregulatingFDI.

WemustkeepinmindthatwhicheverinterpretativemodelofFDIweuse,itmaybealteredfromadynamicpointofview.Thisiseventruesointhecaseofacountrythatisintheprocessofdevelopingandwithgoodeconomicprospects,suchasChina.Aninitialinterpretativefocusbasedoninvestinginordertoexportcanbecomplementedwithasecondfocusoninvestinginordertosellintheinternalmarket—thehomemarketoftheforeigninvestorshavingbeensaturated—andinthismannerconsolidateFDIforthefuture.

Acknowledgements

´pezRoaforhiscollaborationandforTheauthorswishtothankProfessorAngelLuisLo

thesupportgiventousduringthepreparationofthispaper.Also,wewishtothankF.T.HanerofBERIforyourcontributiontoprovideusthePRIandORIIndexofChina.Theauthorsareresponsibleforanyremainingerrorsandomissions.References

Agarwal,J.P.(1980).Determinantsofforeigndirectinvestments:Asurvey.WeltwirtschaftlichesArchiv,116,739–777.

Aharoni,Y.(1966).Theforeigninvestmentdecisionprocess.Cambridge,MA:HarvardUniversityPress.

Bennet,P.D.,&Green,R.T.(1972).Politicalinstabilityasadeterminantofforeigndirectinvestmentinmarketing.JournalofMarketingResearch,9,162–186.

Davidson,R.,&MacKinnon,J.G.(1993).Estimationandinferenceineconometrics.London:OxfordUniversityPress.

Dollar,D.(1992).Outward-orienteddevelopingeconomiesreallydogrowmorerapidly:Evidencefrom95LDC’s1976–1985.EconomicDevelopmentandCulturalChange,40,523–544.

´micaenChina:Unmarcointerpretativodelainversio´nextranjera.Giner,G.(2000).Reformayaperturaecono

Tesisdoctoral(PhD).

280J.M.Giner,G.Giner/ChinaEconomicReview15(2004)268–280

´n.IIIJornadasdeGiner,J.M.,&Giner,G.(1999,Abril).ElsistemabancarioenChina:Estructurayevolucio

´ticaEcono´mica(Alicante,Spain).Polı

´micaenChina:Unareflexio´nsobreelGiner,J.M.,&Giner,G.(2000,Diciembre).Aperturayreformaecono

´ticaEcono´mica(Tenerife,Spain).EstadodelBienestar.IVJornadasdePolı

´ndirectaextranjera:Unaaprox-Giner,J.M.,&Giner,G.(2001,Abril).Modelosinterpretativosdelainversio

´´´imacionalcasodeChina.IIIReuniondeEconomıaMundial(Madrid,Spain).

´nextranjeraenChina:Ana´lisisypolı´ticas.VJornadasdeGiner,J.M.,&Giner,G.(2002a,Mayo).Lainversio

´ticaEcono´mica(Bilbao,Spain).Polı

´nextranjeraenChina:Ana´lisisypolı´ticas.Boletı´nICEEcono´mico,Giner,J.M.,&Giner,G.(2002b).Lainversio

2733,43–54.

Hein,S.(1992).Tradestrategyandthedependencyhypothesis:Acomparisonofpolicy,foreigninvestment,andeconomicgrowthinLatinAmericaandEastAsia.EconomicDevelopmentandCulturalChange,40(3),495–521.

Helleiner,G.K.(1989).Transnationalcorporationsanddirectforeigninvestment.Handbookofdevelopmenteconomics,vol.II(pp.1441–1480).Amsterdam:Elsevier.

Johnston,J.,&DiNardo,J.E.(1997).Econometricmethods(4thed.).New-York:McGraw-Hill.Leamer,E.(1985).Sensitivityanalysiswouldhelp.AmericanEconomicReview,73(3),308–313.

Levis,M.(1979).Doespoliticalinstabilityindevelopingcountriesaffectforeigninvestmentflow?Anempiricalexamination.ManagementInternationalReview,19,59–68.

Liu,X.,Wang,Ch.,&Wei,Y.(2001).CausallinksbetweenforeigndirectinvestmentandtradeinChina.ChinaEconomicReview,12(1),40–57.

Lucas,R.(1993).Onthedeterminantsofdirectforeigninvestment:EvidencefromEastandSoutheastAsia.WorldDevelopment,21(3),391–406.

Nigh,D.(1985).TheeffectofpoliticaleventsonUSdirectforeigninvestment:Apooledtime-seriescrosssectionalanalysis.JournalofInternationalBusinessStudies,16,1–17.

Pearce,R.,Islam,A.,&Sauvant,K.(1992).Thedeterminantsofforeigndirectinvestment.Asurveyofempiricalevidence.NuevaYork:UnitedNations.

Rolfe,R.,Ricks,D.,Pointer,M.,&McCarthy,M.(1993).DeterminantsofFDIincentivepreferenceofMNEs.JournalofInternationalBusinessStudies,24(2),335–355.

Root,F.,&Ahmed,A.(1979).Empiricaldeterminantsofmanufacturingdirectforeigninvestmentindevelopingcountries.EconomicDevelopmentandCulturalChange,27,751–767.

Schneider,F.,&Frey,B.(1985).Economicandpoliticaldeterminantsofforeigndirectinvestment.WorldDevelopment,13(2),161–175.

Singh,H.,&Jun,K.W.(1995).Somenewevidencesondeterminantsofforeigndirectinvestmentindevelopingcountries.PolicyResearchWorkingPapers,vol.1531.Washington,DC:WorldBank.

Song,H.,Liu,Z.,&Jiang,P.(2001).AnalisingthedeterminantsofChina’saggregateinvestmentinthereformperiod.ChinaEconomicReview,12(2–3),227–242.

´n:Author.StateStatisticalBureau(1996).Chinastatisticalyearbook1996.Pekı

´n:Author.StateStatisticalBureau(1997).Chinastatisticalyearbook1997.Pekı

´n:Author.StateStatisticalBureau(1998).Chinastatisticalyearbook1998.Pekı

Wallsten,T.(Ed.)(1980).Cognitiveprocessesinchoiceanddecisionbehavior.Hillsdale,NJ:Erlbaum.

Wheeler,D.,&Mody,A.(1992).Internationalinvestmentlocationdecisions:ThecaseofUSfirms.JournalofInternationalEconomics,33,57–76.

Woodward,D.,&Rolfe,R.(1993).Thelocationofexport-orientedforeigndirectinvestmentintheCaribbeanBasin.JournalofInternationalStudies,24(1),121–144.

Wu,X.(2001).Foreigndirectinvestment,intellectualpropertyrights,andwageinequalityinChina.ChinaEconomicReview,11(4),361–384.

Zhang,Q.,&Felmingham,B.(2001).TherelationshipbetweeninwarddirectforeigninvestmentandChina’sprovincialexporttrade.ChinaEconomicReview,12(1),82–99.

Zhao,Y.(2001).Foreigndirectinvestmentandrelativewages.ChinaEconomicReview,12(1),40–57.

因篇幅问题不能全部显示,请点此查看更多更全内容